16.1 C
Dublin
Friday, May 9, 2025
Home Blog Page 19

365 days of running

Not content with running 14 days in a row or being smug about getting to run in West Cork every day Diarmuid Ó Súilleabháin has just completed 365 days of running in a row. That’s him in the middle. Spot the other Cork people.

Dungarvan 10 mile | Sportsworld Running Club

At this time last year when restrictions were entering our lives and it was becoming apparent that we wouldn’t be able to train or race the way we had been used to, I’d the bright idea to run each day of lockdown to give myself a running goal to work towards until things got back to normal in a few weeks. Little did we know at the time that the breaks would be applied for quite so long. Hopefully not too much more.

I was worried that it would be hard to get used to running every day with no rest but the body got used to it a lot faster than I thought. I’ve also been lucky that I haven’t been injured or sick in the last year.

During the lockdown I found myself living in West Cork all the time. Although I missed the fun and comradery of accompanied running, with time I was able to enjoy the solitary runs in great scenery and wildlife while watching the seasons change. Highlights had to be seeing dolphins and the native Irish lizard recently.

I now find myself having run every day for a little over a year. A total of over 4,000km and many pairs of runners later. It’s much more than I’ve run on any other year previously (and probably any year to come).

Now, do I tell non-runners about this, hell no, they would have me locked up, or would I have started this if I thought it would last so long, no again, but given I’m this far I’ll try and keep going until the end of these lockdowns?

Woodstock loop challenge with Liam Lenehan

Liam Lenehan on location in scenic Kilkenny

I posted my local Woodstock Loop trail run here a couple of weeks ago and figured with a bit of prompting (arm twisting) from one of my Sportsworld Masters buddies who shall remain anonymous (Peter Knaggs), I might as well post my own vertical kilometre challenge for charities (Pieta and Irish Cancer Society) which I completed on the loop last Saturday.

I had entered the 2020 vertical kilometre race in Chamonix in The Alps which of course was cancelled. It had been in my head since to come up with a lockdown alternative and the opportunity presented itself with the Gimme 1,000 challenge which my daughter told me about on Friday night! She and her friends were doing 1,000 squats on the day. Running up and down hills is more my thing so up early the following morning for juice, porridge and coffee and I was all set to go at 9.45 AM.

Liam enjoying himself on the route, any why not?

Starting at the top car park, I ran down and up to one side of the main hill of The Loop and then down and up the other side, a circuit if you like of about 4k with 165m of climb and descent. Just over six of those and I would reach the 1,000 metres. Conditions were tough – not particularly cold but gusty wind and rain meant a top to toe gear change at halfway was essential and of course hot coffee and fruit cake which my sherpa Orla (my nearest and dearest) arrived with. Sheltering in the car and starting to feel it in the legs, I knew I needed something to egg me on for the second half. I thought of my namesake, the famous Kerry mountain runner and former world champion, John Lenihan. John became known as The Conqueror of Carrauntoohill (he won that IMRA race 19 times – worth reading Ian O’Riordan’s piece from 2015 about the book about him, Tough as Leather. I will race The Carrauntoohill IMRA one day but thought in the meantime, why not add the extra metres to get to the equivalent height. Googled it, not much extra – 1.038m.

Just over two and a half hours of running (excl. coffee/change break) and I had covered 24k and climbed and descended 1,043m. Mission accomplished. Writing this on Monday evening, I am happy to admit that my legs are still tired, my lower back is still achy but my spirits are still high.

https://www.idonate.ie/fundraiser/11397180_flimsy-worms-team-page.html

 

New Balance Lovefest

I learned a moat valuable lesson over the past week. It’s best not to boast about your delivery of new running shoes on Instagram as you’ll quickly find yourself writing a review of said running shoes for the club’s weekly email.

This week under limited duress or coercion I’m giving my two cents on two shoes from New Balance. Firstly the 1080V11, an ideal daily trainer and secondly the New Balance RC. The RC is a competitor with the growing range of super shoes e.g. Adidas Adizero Pro, Brooks Hyperion Elite 2, HOKA Carbon X, Nike Alphafly Next% and Saucony Endorphin Pro.

Overall they’re both great shoes so that about covers the reviews but that might leave the reader asking why New Balance?

NB FuelCell RC Elite

This story begins way back when a sales guy at a speciality running store told me I should wear Asics. I was new to running, new to exercise for its own sake, and consequently was three pant-sizes above my ideal. As I ran more and training increased I learned a little about running gaits and what terms like neutral or stability meant. I discovered that your choice of running shoe is a very personal decision. You’ve got to balance how well they protect your feet and legs with how they fit, how heavy they are and, yes, even how they look.

Around 2011, starting to feel like I had outgrown the Asics bricks on my feet I switched to Nike trying out the Vomero then Pegasus for a few years. This was way before PBEX foams came along but both of these were great shoes. At the time Nike had the best foam, a title which they have regained since. I will add a note that Asics have also revived themselves in 2020 with some great new shoes such as the Nimbus Lite and Glide Ride ranges. They needed it but they are making progress now.

At the same time, the Vibram craze was going on, making podiatrists, physios and speciality running stores all a bit richer. It was like some sick experiment at the expense of the novice runner who was suckered into thinking they could switch from a tank-like Asics Kayano to running barefoot in a matter of weeks or months, without any consequence or injury. I decided that I wanted to try something lighter but not too light so I got a recommendation for a new shoe from Adidas called the Adizero Mana.

Although these have since been discontinued the popular Boston range is now very much along the same lines. The Boston many people will know is an all-round neutral running shoe for everyday training, up-tempo workouts, speed and race training as well as for race-day running over longer distances. Compared to other Adidas shoes the Boston feels a bit firm/hard which gives it a nice bouncy foot stride feel.

When Adidas released its revolutionary Boost midsole foam, it not only re-asserted the German company as the most dominant global brand in long-distance racing shoes but it also set off a firestorm inside the R&D labs of just about every other shoe manufacturer. Boost, made from TPU pellets thermally welded together, was the first midsole foam to serve up high levels of both shock-absorbing cushiness and bounce-back responsiveness. Adidas made a good call to only sell their running shoes in speciality stores. You could buy Adidas in regular sports shops but they weren’t for the serious runner. It gave them an edge and its a tactic Nike has also employed.

Up until 2018, I swore by Adidas. Prior to the Nike 4% and the birth of the super shoe revolution, all of the marathon world records were set in Adidas Adios Boost Adizero shoes which is the race day equivalent of the Boston. Like many brands before it though Adidas has been slow to innovate and running has moved on. They are still good solid shoes but in 2018, I heard a podcast with the New Balance Running USA Product Manager. For the past few years, they had been slowing gaining fresh momentum, making a come back if you will. They were experimenting with the latest foams and bringing modern approaches to running shoe technology. I was sold. I bought my first pair of 1080v9s in 2018 and was blown away by the comfort.

When it comes to choosing the right shoes, I now believe the most scientifically sound criteria we have is comfort. Choose a shoe that feels good and you’ll run more efficiently and suffer fewer injuries. Comfort is different for everyone, and changes with body type, muscle strength/weakness, speed, stride, fatigue, previous injury, terrain, climate, age, attitude, etc., in short, a kaleidoscope of variables.

For me, in 2021 New Balance shoes offer the best in plush trimmings, ample cushioning and luxurious foothold. They have taken what science knows and applied it to their shoe range picking the best bits from the barefoot running and maximalist shoe trends and marrying that with modern foams. My only concern is where is that force going? We might see a whole new range of running injuries in the future.

 

New balance 1080V11

This is the shoe for you if you are feeling beat up, or simply want some cruiser miles to get the blood flowing without pounding. The 1080v11 is well suited for luxurious recovery runs, thanks to the Fresh Foam cushioning and the upper’s relaxed comfortable fit.

1080 has consistently been New Balance’s expression of plushness, a soft coaxing way of getting runners to enjoy the activity, even when they are not necessarily feeling moved to get out the door. Perhaps that’s because comfort is an immediate, step-in feeling, one of the best in the industry. The Fresh Foam midsole, blown rubber outsole and rockered design are enough to lull you into running, almost as though they could put you in a hypnotic trance. If you are heavy heal striker hough this shoe may result in you hitting the ground too quickly.

Ideal for daily training, even for those racking up high mileage, 1080 is forgiving and well suited for easier “laid back” runs and recovery days, not unlike its predecessor, the 1080v10, since the updates were relatively minor. The step-in comfort is a lasting one and, when paired with the smooth roll-through of the rocker midsole, it makes 1080 an everyday trainer that promises to be dependable and durable. I wear these for my Sunday long runs and can comfortably get up to marathon pace in them but any faster and I need to switch shoes.

I have put 600K on previous pairs of the 1080s and despite not really seeing much degradation I do notice the change when I put on a fresh pair. The closest shoe to this is the Brooks Glycerin 19 but I like this allot more. If you want something lighter then 880s  (Ciara McGeans shoe of choice) is also a fantastic shoe and if you are suffering from any sort of foot or Achilles niggle the New Balance More is an even more maximalist line with a similar style and fit.

Offset: 8mm (27mm heel/19mm forefoot)

Price: €150

New Balance RC

New Balance was one of the first brands to delve into shoes with built carbon-fibre plates embedded in the midsoles, but it chose to start with the FuelCell 5280 middle-distance trainer/racer rather than a half marathon/marathon racer such as we’ve now seen from multiple other brands. This became famous with world champion Jenny Simpson and then the likes of Ciara McGean seen wearing them on the track.

New Balance released the FuelCell TC in early 2020 as a cushy long-distance trainer, but the debut of the FuelCell RC Elite finally brings the brand into the speedy long-distance racing conversation. A few elite runners raced in a pre-production prototype model of this shoe at the 2020 U.S. Olympic Trials in Atlanta last February, but there wasn’t a lot of buzz about it prior to its release.

NB FuelCell RC Elite bottom

The FuelCell RC Elite borrows learnings from the FuelCell 5280 and the FuelCell TC and is adapted from the sleek, lightweight 1400 racing platform. First things first, the magic sauce of the FuelCell RC Elite is its new, low-density, high-rebound FuelCell midsole made from a featherweight blend of EVA and TPU (similar to PBEX).

The other special element in this shoe is the curvy carbon-fibre plate that works in concert with that foam to provide optimal energy return as a runner’s foot rolls through the gait cycle while also reducing foot fatigue. I have only worn these a tiny bit but the FuelCell RC is worth the price. It’s a modern-day rocket race of a shoe, stripped down to offer just what you need to run fast as efficiently as possible over long distances. It offers the right amount of cushion and structure without adding any extras you don’t need, with a ride that feels like it will accommodate a variety of strides.

While none of the modern super shoes is designed for daily running or even long-wearing use, this feels more durable based on the materials and the construction techniques.  I haven’t been so excited about a shoe since I put on that first Adizero Mana way back in the day. And like a lot of those previous shoes, the faster and more efficient you run, the more stable this shoe will feel.

The cheaper TC has no carbon plate but is still a fabulous session day or Sunday long run shoes. They are soon to be replaced so are starting to pop up with large discounts, though still in the €140 – €150 range. I would recommend either depending on budget.

Heel-Toe Offset: 10mm (32mm heel, 22mm forefoot)

Price: €200

My favourite thing about these new shoes is a great ride with the new rockered technology. I can’t wait to get back on the cross country and try some new upcoming competitors to last years dragonfly spike. The spike world needs similar super shoe innovation as nobody enjoys those post race day calves in traditional spikes. According to the new paper, there are three likely reasons why the new shoes are faster than earlier racing shoes: (1) curved carbon-fibre plates; (2) a lighter and more responsive midsole material; and (3) thicker midsoles. I for one hope the innovation continues and see it as a good thing for the sport. I would encourage everyone to go out and find a super shoe that suits you.

 

 

 

 

 

Garmin 645 Review

I (Gareth Murran) was asked to write a short review of my running watch. It might be the start of a new weekly column or something. I had hoped I’d seen the end of this thing but let’s get started. Garmin offers some of the best-running watches around – but up until not too long ago they have been largely functional, just showing you performance numbers. A few years back the Apple Watch, Nike Plus Watch and Samsung Gear Sport had started encroaching on Garmin’s space, bringing both GPS tracking and the ability to stream to a Bluetooth headset, Garmin needed to catch up.

The Garmin 645 was the companies first wearable with music on board when it was launched in March 2018. That means that you can buy a pair of Bluetooth earphones and not have to carry a phone or mp3 player when you want to listen to music on your runs. This was my main reason for buying it. I paid the hefty sum of $450 at a race in Truckee California, a few months after it had come out in 2018. Two years later I can happily report that it’s my first Garmin watch to have lasted more than a year. previous watches particularly the 410 would last 6 months and then give up the ghost.

If you just want to know if its any good then my quick summary review would be that the Forerunner 645 Music is a watch that can track a huge variety of sports and looks good while doing it. However, the headline music playback feature feels a bit half-baked and the battery life isn’t as good as we’ve experienced on other Garmin watches. Overall though I feel its probably one of the better Garmins available. It’s improved allot with software updates and the much-lauded Spotify app. If you’rere considering a sports watch and don’t do anything aside from running then the 245 music may be a better option. The entry-level 45 will do you if all you want is basic pace and reliable GPS but I would always recommend the 245 and up as a better investment. It will help you improve your running in all sorts of ways.

FOR

  • Lovely design
  • Rapid GPS
  • Spotify support

AGAINST

  • Poor battery life

For the rest of the review, I thought I’d list some of my favourite things about the watch and justify recommending it.

Numerous studies have shown that running with music increases concentration, provides the ongoing stimulus and generates a positive sense of flow. Compelling melodies, powerful beats, and energetic tunes can help runners get into an optimal mindset and can motivate them to get (and keep) moving. The Forerunner 645 Music has the right bits to be a great little entertainer on the go: 4GB of internal storage should carry 500 songs with you.  That means you can store every Beatles song ever released and still have 50% free for podcasts or maybe calming meditations. I save my playlists on Spotify and then just update them once a month or so. The controls are a little fiddly at first but you use them so often it soon becomes easy to skip tracks without looking down.

My top tip for running with music is don’t waste your money on overpriced earphones unless you are a real audiophile. These from Boltune are just as good as Airpods, cost £25 and will last as long.

The accuracy of the GPS is pretty good – perhaps a little generous over a longer run, with tests on 18 and 20 mile runs showing a 1% differential, running further than the measured distance. It’s no big deal, but in a marathon, that 0.2 extra bit of a mile can be a bit disconcerting if you’re trying to run to a specific pace. This was an issue for me in Copenhagen last year.  Over shorter distances, it performs really well, without ever having to wait for a satellite. Gone are the days of sticking your watch on a window before your run. Treadmill running tests I have done also proved pretty accurate too.

Overall wellbeing scores are a must. Sleep, step, heart rate and even stress tracks are all very well presented on the watch, meaning there are few devices that offer a more complete experience in terms of showing your overall fitness level. The stress testing is among the most impressive, with the ability to read your heart rate variance (the difference in the shape of each heartbeat) and from that discern your stress levels. That heart rate variance can also pinpoint accurately your lactate threshold, meaning the Forerunner 645 can tell you with good accuracy when you’re going to start tiring in a race. It’s not a new feature to Garmin watches, but it’s really advanced and useful.

When it comes to running for steady-state or easy runs wrist-based heart rate is perfectly fine, no issues there. But for intervals, its performance is a bit mixed. Optical HR sensor accuracy is rather varied from individual to individual. Aspects such as skin colour, hairy arm syndrome, and position can impact accuracy. Position, and how the band is worn, are the most important pieces according to the manual. A unit with an optical HR sensor should be snug. It doesn’t need to leave marks, but you shouldn’t be able to slide a finger under the band (at least during workouts). You can wear it a tiny bit looser the rest of the day. For most of my runs, it’s consistent and although I have the Garmin HRM-Run I only use it once a week or so, typically turning to the consistency of the optical sensor.

The HRM-Run heart rate monitor provides the most advanced running metrics to high-end Garmin Forerunner running watches. This is, without doubt, the best bit of kit on the market to buy if you are serious about improving your biomechanics. It’s only available on the more expensive models. The HRM-RUN is a £100 transmitter pod with an accelerometer which can measure movement. These same accelerometers are also used within phones, foot pods, activity trackers, and many other devices. It’s this sensor that ultimately enables you to get metrics such as Ground Contact Time and Vertical Oscillation. These metrics will blow your mind for the first few weeks. Despite there not being a huge amount of scientific literature I feel that Garmin has done a great job with these features. I think in future models they will become part of the watch but the technology is just not there yet.

The pod also provides a secondary source of cadence. Earlier in the year, I was looking to see why I couldn’t shift a knee injury on my left knee. I used the data from the watch to compare my ground contact time on each foot and simultaneously improve my cadence which had gone as low as 150. Both of these points demonstrated that I was overcompensating or protecting my left side. GCT is a really interesting measurement of how long your foot spends on the ground each time you touch the ground.  It’s measured in milliseconds.  You can see this on one of my recent interval runs, where at faster paces it’s shorter, and slower paces it’s longer.

Garmin Pay is the easy way to pay – directly from your watch. No phone or wallet needed! What more could you want on a Sunday in the Phoenix Park or when you need that bottle of water on a warm Sunday long run. Irish banks have been a bit slow to adopt a broad range of contactless payment options, but there are plenty of easy to follow tutorials online for getting the watch working with your choose contactless options.

     

The screen itself is very clear, and a had a nice degree of sharpness. It’s not in the same league as many modern smartwatches, granted, but it’s more than good enough in day to day use and we never were unable to see the numbers when out on a run and really, that’s all that matters. The rounded display can make things a bit congested when you’ve got four different bits of data on one screen, but even then it’s easy to make out what’s being shown. You can have 123 or 4 boxes on display when doing a workout. I usually use pace, elapsed time, distance and cadence. If I’m doing intervals I have a second display with lap splits. I don’t stop my watch after the intervals as I think seeing my recovery later is more important than the chest flex fast kilometre time on Strava.

The screen, like many Garmin running watches, is transflective technology, which makes it clear and bright in most scenarios when light is shining directly on it, meaning it catches even a small amount of photons pretty well to help you see what’s on the display. If you’re in the dark there’s an illuminating light, and Garmin has done pretty well with the accelerometer to make the watch light up whenever you raise your wrist – to do this on a run is pretty advanced.  I recommend setting this to the highest setting in winter, but this will drain the battery. The only slight downside is that colours are a little muted, but that’s the price paid for the transflective technology.

Finally, I need to talk about Garmin connect. I remember being overwhelmed by all the information on the app when I got my first Garmin. A little bit of experience sifting through all the options, though, and it has become a reliable training tool. After you’ve paired your device, you’ll be able to sync your watch to the phone or to the computer. Typically, this will occur automatically a designated number of times per day depending on how it’s set up. this is one of the benefits over older watches which were synced manually. Connect also has badges if that kind of stuff motivates you, typically it does for people who are new to exercise not the main audience for a Garmin watch. Garmin Connect | Free Online Fitness Community

The 645 allow you to create specific workouts to upload to your watch. Your watch then gives you alerts to follow. Select an activity like running and then input information for warm-up, workout, and cool down. As mentioned above when talking about the screen, you’re able to add information like heart rate, pace, distance, time, and cadence. If you’re doing intervals, that is super simple – you just select the Add a Repeat button. I find this useful for some types of workouts but its often hard to do an exact 3K warm-up or exactly 1-minute recoveries. In some ways, though this feature can keep you accountable. The best feature for this is the elapsed time vs active time where there should be a low or zero differential.

When travelling you can put together routes, which you are then able to upload to your watch. Also if you’re planning to do a long run and don’t want to have to remember all your turns or if you’re training to do GPS art, this feature is a life-saver! Some of the features are redundant particularly if you are heavy Strava users with premium access.

Its’s debatable which app does things better but Garmin isn’t trying to be a social network, it’s more focused on data that can improve your running than Strava. I find Strava’s training stress numbers wildly inaccurate but Garmin pretty decent. I do prefer the shoe tracker on Strava than Garmin but it’s one of the few things I use. Garmin like Strava can send too many push notifications so I just disable these entirely. Apologies if you feel I’m ignoring your Kudos, Martin Doyle. How does he do it so fast?

Through Connect you’ll be able to see cumulative kilometres over weeks, months, and years. The stats section is pretty cool because it will tell you your PRs if you need to know what to beat for your next race. Lifetime totals are also included. A bar graph shows your monthly mileage totals for the past year. With it, you can see what months have been your best for training. You can use this information to make adjustments to your training plan based on what works for you. I do use the weekly mileage target on Starve and Garmin as they both  have good and bad aspects.

Many coaches recommend keeping a running journal to see what food works and doesn’t work, what runs were successful and why, what runs were awful and why, and so forth. With the Garmin Connect app, you’ll be able to easily do this. I’m not sure a notebook is needed these days but they do say that you should write down your goals. You can make your own mind up on that I guess. Although you can also add notes to your runs and pictures so that you can remember particular runs even better.

Although all the information that you can find on the Garmin Connect app might be a little bit overwhelming to you right now, pretty soon you’ll be glad that you can access all that data! Particularly if you are quite an intrinsically motivated person and love to geek out on the data.

One final point the charging cable has broken a couple of times, through my own fault but they are really cheap to buy on Amazon so get a few. Your friend will be eternally grateful when you have a spare one and to offer.

DSC_8239

 

Dublin Virtual Marathon 2020

Apart Christmas and my summer holidays, the Dublin marathon weekend is one of my favourite times of the year. I love the tapper, the registration, the atmosphere and dinner and few pints after the race. So needless to say I was very disappointed when it was cancelled, but I’m well aware that there is a bigger picture here and the right decision was made for the safety of all involved.

I had no intention in doing a virtual marathon, but four weeks ago some old triathlon club friends got in touch and told me they were doing it on the Sunday in Tymon park, so I said why not. I did some excellent training with Sportsworld over the last few months, but I have not done much long distance running lately. However, I felt in decent enough shape.

The route consisted of eight laps, starting and finishing at the basketball arena. Not a bad day, but was windy enough. We started out at 7.30am and the park was nice a quiet. It did get busier as the morning went on, and taking an educated guess, I would say there were other clubs doing their virtual marathon there too. The support was great, pockets of encouragement along the way.

I felt good until about mile 20, until I started to get some stomach cramps. These lifted at mile 22 and I felt great and put in some of best miles at this stage. Then bang, mile 25 I was a dead man walking, but knew the work was done at that stage and I just had to see it home. It was great to have my wife and two kids cheering me on at the end too. I finished with 3hrs 11mins, which was 11 minutes quicker than 2019 and two minutes quicker than my personal best, so I was a happy man. I put the improvement down to the training with Sportsworld and I’m hoping Emily can push me to crack that three hour barrier in 2021.

Running Economy: How to run faster for longer

What is running economy?

According to Wikipedia Running Economy (RE) measures runners’ energy utilization when running at an aerobic intensity.  Those who are able to consume less oxygen while running at a given pace are said to have a better running economy.  Given two runners of equal fitness (V02max) the more economical runner will be able to sustain an aerobic pace for longer and thus outperform the less economical runner over distance.  (The benefits of running economy are more evident in distances over 10k).

What determines running economy?

Running economy is impacted by a myriad of factors from born-with-it physical attributes to the price of your runners,  through simple, old fashioned “putting in the miles”.  But some of these are beyond our control and mileage has an upper limit for most bodies.  Running form is a factor which is somewhat controllable.

How is economy measured?

Precise measurement of running economy is best done in controlled treadmill conditions but a good simple test whether a runner has improved economy is running quicker times over a set distance while exercising at the same heart rate.

Another suggestion is to get a  friend to video a few minutes of your running and then compare it to the style of elite runners to give some clues as to where energy is being expended without yielding forward movement.

What can be done to improve?

Firstly, trying to change running style is not without risk.  Stories abound of heel strikers trying to change to midfoot strikers only to put their foot out of action.  (It is now suggested that the issue is not so much what part of your foot touches the ground first, but how close that initial contact is to underneath your hips, i.e. your centre of mass.)

Secondly, what improves economy for one runner may have the opposite effect in another so it’s very much about finding what works for the individual.

That said, perhaps one of the least risky ways to improve your RE is to optimize cadence.  Cadence if the number of steps taken per minute while running and is usually displayed in your Garmin app or Stava.  Elite runners tend toward the 180 but one size does not fit all.  Taller people will tend towards a slower cadence and vice versa.  One of the side benefits of experimenting with a higher cadence is that, speed gains aside, a higher cadence reduces loading on the knees, hips and lower back and reduces overstriding and the associated braking forces.

-Simple Cadence Drill

  1. Find out your current cadence. If you use a Garmin this metric shows up in your Strava or Connect apps alternatively you can count your steps for one minute.
  2. Use a metronome or music to increase your steps per minute. An increase of 5-10 per cent is a good place to start, once or twice a week.  If using music you can find the beats per minute of your chosen soundtrack here.  (https://getsongbpm.com/song/blinding-lights/57633B)

Relax

One final thought.  Running economy is also found to be better in relaxed runners.  Therefore any drills to improve form or cadence are probably best kept as short focussed drills to enable muscle memory to build up, rather than being shoehorned onto the next long run.

Further reading and listening:

Below are some (of the many!) links available on the topic of running economy:

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/understanding-running-economy-christos-ziliaskoudis/id1494778818?i=1000490842014

https://www.trainingpeaks.com/blog/finding-your-perfect-run-cadence/

https://blog.mapmyrun.com/how-arm-swing-affects-your-running-efficiency/

 

 

 

Ely Arch

 

The Triumphal Arch was built in 1767 as a “new gate” to Rathfarnham Castle to commemorate the return of the castle into the hands of the Loftus family.

The red line running south west of “Lord Ely Gate” is the Woodside development and likely site of the avenue between Rathfarnham Castle and the gate
Corresponding OS map from possibly 1830s showing the open space and several weirs running alongside the avenue to the castle

Rathfarnham Castle was originally built for the Loftus family around 1583, had passed in and out of the family over the years but had most recently been lost by a rakish descendant, Philip Wharton, credited as a founder of the original hell fire club in 1719.  In the South Sea Bubble of 1720s Philip incurred debts equivalent to about 40 million in todays terms and had to sell Rathfarnham castle and lands.    Some 50 years later,  another descendant, Henry Loftus, bought them back.  Henry carried out extensive renovations and improvements but the Loftus family left the castle in 1812, never to return.  The Castle and grounds were then used as a dairy farm and fell into disrepair, the area being described as follows in 1838:

“Crossing the Dodder by a ford, and proceeding along its southern bank towards Rathfarnham, a splendid gateway at left, accounted among the best productions of that species of architecture in Ireland, invites the tourist to explore the once beautiful grounds of Rathfarnham Castle, but they are now all eloquently waste, the undulating hills covered with rank herbage, the rivulet stagnant and sedgy, the walks scarce traceable, the ice-houses open to the prying sun, the fish-pond clogged with weeds, while the mouldering architecture of the castle, and the crumbling, unsightly offices in its immediate vicinity …”

In 1841 the arch was the scene of a brutal murder, when the dead body of an Italian named Garlibardo, an organ-grinder,  was found lying on the open ground in front of the gate. Although arrests were made at the time no one was convicted of the murder.

After the division of the estate in 1913 the arch became the entrance to the Castle Golf Club but it was later abandoned in favour of the more direct Woodside Drive.

Sources:

http://www.patrickcomerford.com/

Rathfarnham Roads by Patrick Healy , South Dublin Libraries 2005

 

 

Clew Bay Half Marathon – 19th September 2020

As is the nature of these damned COVID times we live in, there was much uncertainty in the build-up to the event around whether it would actually go ahead or not. This was made all the more challenging with the introduction of the local lockdowns in Kildare, Laois and Offaly in early August which were then followed by tightened Government restrictions on a national level from 18th August, a move which in particular from a race perspective prohibited outdoor gatherings of more than 15 people (down from the previous level of 200). While the easy option would have been to cancel the race there and then, credit to the organisers who decided to wait it out for the next key Government update on 13th September before making the final call. Thankfully, the event did not need to be cancelled in the end, with participants notified on the Monday that the race would proceed as planned on the Saturday.

Two separate races were held on the day, with a 10k in the morning and the half marathon a few hours later. This annual event is now in its 10th year with monies raised used to develop and support health and fitness facilities for the local community of Louisburgh, Co. Mayo.

Understandably, race day 2020 was much different from those that preceded it with a number of measures introduced to ensure a safe environment for all. These included no changing rooms, shower facilities, spectators or the famed post-run feast (something I could have done with afterwards and look forward to the next time!).

Conditions on the day were ideal for running, with the sun out, a relatively cool temperature and little to no wind – more on that later. Runners were moved to the starting line at 1.30pm. As I waited for the gun and with a few butterflies in tow, I suddenly felt something in my shoe and decided it was best to tackle it there and then as opposed to it potentially annoying me for the duration of the race. As luck would have it, just as I managed to get my shoe off then so too did the starters gun go off and away the field went. Twenty seconds or so later and with the rest of the pack now firmly in the distance and the race marshal directing me over the loudspeaker to get moving, I finally got started. While weaving around other participants is not an ideal way to begin, and starting last not necessarily something I’d recommend, I did however find as the race progressed that it gave me a nice lift at times to pass the occasional runner here and there.

The Clew Bay course itself begins at Louisburgh GAA club and from there traverses a series of winding country roads, taking in a variety of landscapes including mountain views, bog land, farm land and the sea. Given it was my first race proper and therefore not really having much to compare against, I did however find the course to be quite hilly and certainly much more than I had bargained for.

In terms of my own performance, while new to the running game (one positive at least to take from lockdown) I felt I had put in a solid few weeks since the return to collective Sportsworld training and was therefore hoping to run a time of 1:30 or better. To achieve this, I needed a race pace of about 6:50 minutes per mile. While I pretty much stuck consistently to that pace for the first five miles, for the next three that followed I felt like I was moving well and started to attack the course a bit more. Things started to change considerably from about mile nine/ten onwards however when you turn for home at Killeen Cemetery. From this point on it was a completely different race, running in to a strong wind (the course now taking you closer to the sea) and what seemed like a never-ending set of hills.

My mile times started to drift out from there until about the last quarter mile or so where I managed to muster up some strength and sprint for the finish line.

In the end, I made it in in just under the 1:30 mark, finishing with a chip time of 1:29:28 (and gun time of 1:29:54 – due to aforementioned messing around with my shoe). Nothing spectacular, and plenty lessons learned, but all in all I was happy and particularly so as I managed to achieve my goal. Hopefully with a bit more targeted training and perhaps a flatter course, I can shave some time off that further down the line.

It was great to get my first competitive race under the belt and was a privilege to be able to do so in these most challenging of times when far more races (and all the rest) are being cancelled than going ahead. Finally, hats off to the organisers for what was a thoroughly enjoyable event and one where the health and safety of all those in attendance was very much to the forefront throughout.

National Masters Track Championships 2020

National Master’s Track & Field, Morton Stadium, Santry 6th September 2020

 By Anthony Gillen, Garrett Banahan, Liam Lenehan & Brian Conway

 Anthony Gillen’s 1500m

I was lined up in the second heat with 5 runners from my age group and another 9 runners from the O40 category.  My overall plan for the race was to run 60- 80- 80- 80 for about 5:00 minutes.

The gun went off, and I went out immediately at about my intended race pace, letting others pass as they wished so I quickly found myself at the back of the pack.  However, at the first bend the pack slowed down noticeably and I thought for an instance that new pace would be the going rate and hence favourable for me.  However, having navigated the bend it was back to normal and I had to settle in to manage on my own at the back.

The first two laps went to plan timewise being right on target times.  But I was at the upper end of my target pace and shortly after seeing one competitor drop out, I began to struggle myself. Left to my own at the back on this occasion I was not able to muster the enthusiasm to kick on.  The remaining laps passed in a blur and I reached the finished line well off a decent time.

The winner came home in 4:22.78.  The results for my age group were:

1              John HENNESSY                 Middleton A.C.                  4:30.01

2              Ken ARCHBOLD                 St. L. O’Toole A.C.            4:36.72

3              Eamon MURPHY               North Sligo A.C.                 4:37.63

4              Michael COUNSEL            Trim A.C.                             4:41.99

5              Anthony GILLEN               Sportsworld A.C.              5:17.93

Many thanks to Peter Knaggs for transport, motivation, and photos.

Garrett Banahan’s 5000m – The Refrigerator in the Sportsworld Singlet

This race was a race of “firsts” for me – first race for Sportsworld, first race for seven months, first track 5k…and first race in the middle of a global pandemic! And I only first believed that last Sunday’s National Masters in Santry would actually go ahead when the Athletics Ireland email came through on the Thursday…especially after the entries for the men’s 5k passed the three figure mark! Athletics Ireland reacted to these unprecedented numbers by tweaking the schedule to basically add a third session to the day specifically for the five or six 5k races they’d need to run off! Anyway, we finally had a race to run…

I got to the stadium in decent time having spent the morning catching a few of the other races on the online stream. There was an orderly/socially-distanced queue of M35 5k entrants waiting outside the gate for the 3:30 opening. When we got into the stadium we were ticked off as having checked in online/confirmed our healthiness, and headed for the stand beside the call “room” (i.e. the covered terrace-bit over by the corner-gate to the Demesne). The atmosphere was a strange combination of very calm and very surreal – even though there were some great 800m races going on, the only sounds were the heavy breathing and spike-strikes of the athletes, the occasional intervention from the PA system, some clapping from our stand, and some commentary from the lads on the online stream from the far side of the stand! It was still great to watch some races live. There were 21 in our O35 race which was scheduled for 5 o’clock – various groups of us warmed up with about five extended laps around the track, before some drills then into the call room at 4:40. Something that would become a bone of contention later was how the “illegal shoe inspection” was more of a question than an inspection (literally – “Is anyone wearing runners?” – to which there were no claims…more later). 4:55 and we were escorted over to the 5k start and assigned our lanes. It was all strangely chilled out, especially for a track race.

 

The gun went and all the chilled-outness disappeared, and what a great feeling it was to get stuck into proper racing again! My plan was to start strong to get into a competitive group, and then see what sub-groups developed from there. As is so often the case, this meant having to go out a bit harder than I should have, but I was happy to sacrifice my time (in every sense of the word) in the interests of racing. I’d also lined up a few lads that I figured I should be near or nearabouts, so that gave me something of a barometer. A group of about four sub-15 “elites” unsurprisingly broke off the front early, leaving a relatively big bunch behind. This stayed together for about four laps before it started “leaking” – I think I got leaked at about a mile in. I was going along at a nice clip though and felt ok in the four or five-strong group that we kept together for a few more laps. I hadn’t been looking at the track splits and received a bit of a nasty shock when we went through the 7.5 lap mark in 10:08…my 3k pb is 10:07! “Trouble.” I knew a few friends who were watching and commenting on the live stream, and I was certain one of them in particular would have noted this slight miscalculation from Garrett! I’ll let his messages that I read later in the WhatsApp group speak for the rest of my race:

17:14: Garrett will either run a massive pb here or completely blow up

17:15: On for sub 17 with a mile to go

17:20: He blew up

17:21: But still a pb

Or what I’d call a race well run!

Even though the last four or five laps were tough, I was still happy to have dug in and, having being lapped by the front four elites with about four laps to go, and then passed by a lad from Portmarnock AC, managed to keep it together and pass a lad from Waterford, and made Drogheda and Blackrock work hard for their Sportsworld scalp in the last three laps (featuring a decent nip and tuck with Blackrock in the last 200m – ending in defeat but hey).

 

It was then a case of handshakes elbow-punches, before circling back to the start line to pick up our things and leaving the stadium “immediately after your event has concluded”. By which I of course cooling down around the track for ages and then doing a lot of stretching on the grassy hill…coincidentally all within sight of the abundance of 5k’s that followed! To be fair I think we benefitted from being the last session of the day, so there was no actual reason to kick us out of the stadium. This was a most welcome development as it meant I got to watch Brian put in a great shift in the M40, and also catch up with Liam before his M60 battle with national-record breaking Tommy Hughes! Fair play to both for clocking excellent sub-20’s respectively. I should also say well done to Anthony Gillen who ran a good-looking time in the 1500 M50 earlier in the day

For those who are interested in watching back any of the 5k’s (or all five of them!), here’s a link to the stream and where to scroll to (I’d recommend watching some of one of them at least for the commentary alone).

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXuYrgo4OeM

M35 5k (feat. Garrett): 7:07:00

M40 5k (feat. Brian): 7:32:00

M60 5k (feat. Liam): 8:47:00

 

The days after the race have featured blisters (12.5 laps in spikes for the first time), figuring out how my sister and a friend of mine managed to earn me the nickname of “The Refrigerator” on the online stream (scroll to 7:28:45…this also explains the title of this report, that and it being an ode to Zig and Zag’s “The Fridge in the Denim Jacket” 1989 masterpiece), and some heated-enough discussions around the number of athletes who raced in “the cheat-boots” (i.e. the Next Percent’s) – including one Crusaders lad in my race who got a great big shoe-shaming by Cathal Dennehy on the live stream (7:10:15).

 

Overall a genuinely great experience and effort by all involved – particularly the organisers. Hopefully it bodes well for a XC season of some description. I’m off to take a week’s break from running myself (another first – first break from running since February), so see you all in a few weeks 🙂

 

Liam Lenehan’s 5000m

Having raced against or more accurately run in the same race as Tommy Hughes, I wanted to add a few lines to Garrett’s report about the man/superstar of Masters running.

You will be hearing a lot more of him in the next 12 months as he smashes Irish and world masters records.

An upside of the Covid restrictions is that for the first time ever in my masters running career (presumptuous), we had a race just for ourselves so to speak. No longer restrained by running blind against opponents in a race for all age categories O35, we O60’s could all see the whites of each others eyes on the starting line. The only time we saw Tommy’s again was when he lapped all of us once and most of us twice! (finishing 6th he still got me for a second time halfway down the finishing straight).

As for yours truly it was my first time to run in Morton Stadium, a first time to race around 12.5 track laps, a first time to run in The Nationals, a first time to be live streamed and best of all, first time to race directly against Tommy and a great bunch of similar vintage athletes. Here’s to a good few more years of the same.

For the record, Tommy’s time was 16.47, Martin McDonnell (runner up with his daughters and son in last years finals of Irelands fittest family) was a close second with a time of 19.23. Running 19.53, I was thrilled to break 20 minutes and and hold my own in a strong field. Thanks to all who watched YouTube stream and supported with live commentary and on Club WhatsApp groups. I knew I had to keep going!

Here is Tommy’s post- race interview:

https://www.facebook.com/130916746939169/posts/3540012082696268/?vh=e&extid=mCLoq3QdfSkcx5fu

And finally; the last word to Brian Conway:

The second heat took off quick and then things seem to settle down after the stagger. It definitely seemed longer than 12 laps or so. I more or less ran my own race (against the clock) as I was a bit behind the main group. Even so, it was enjoyable race.

Results National Masters 2020 Morton Stadium, Santry

1500m 5th in age Anthony Gillen 5:17.93

5000m 17th in age  Garrett Banahan 17:08.36

5000m 17th in age Brian Conway 19:20.35

5000m 6th In age Liam Lenehan 19:53.78

 

Charleville Half Marathon

These last few weeks have seen somewhat of a return to racing albeit in a very different manner than what we are all used to. Mass participation events are still a long way from once again becoming the norm simply because they are impossible to operate within the existing guidelines and social distancing becomes more & more difficult to implement the greater the numbers. Nowadays the races that are going ahead are being organised with much reduced capacity and far more regulation so it’s a credit to the clubs & the organisations that have managed to successfully host a racing event. This weekend just gone saw North Cork AC host the Charleville half marathon.

 

This was a race that I entered a number of months ago however like many others it fell foul of the Government guidelines regarding numbers and the mass participation event was cancelled however they had the green light from Athletics Ireland to proceed with an elite only field with numbers being capped at 100 entrants. Once I heard this I chanced my arm and emailed the organising committee to see if there was any chance that I could have a spot. They were very quick to respond and told me that all 100 invitations had issued however they were expecting drop outs after the National Athletics Championships had completed so they took all my details and put me on a waiting list. Then low and behold they emailed me about two weeks ago and confirmed that there was a place for me.

 

Charleville itself is situated in North Cork very close to the border with Limerick. In fact the race itself is predominantly in Limerick with only the start & finish in Cork. Historically this is a very fast race with many athletes using it as a final training race prior to competing in a marathon. A brief look at the website shows that over the last number of years the vast majority of the fastest half marathon times ran in Ireland were on this course.

 

The week of the race was quite interrupted for me as I picked up an untimely knee injury which put my participation in doubt. Under normal circumstances I wouldn’t, and in hindsight I shouldn’t, have raced but these are not normal circumstances and not knowing when the opportunity to compete in a good quality road race might present itself again I was determined to do everything that I could in order to make the start line. Plus I had just invested in a brand spanking new pair of short shorts that I was only dying to wear in public (spoiler alert: they’re short). A couple of bouts of intense physio during the week and a lot of foam rolling and strength work meant that come Saturday afternoon I felt like I could race the next day and not disgrace myself.

 

Not fancying the drive to Charleville on the morning of the race I decided to book myself into the Charleville Park Hotel for the night before the race. The vast majority of the people staying in the hotel were there for the race and there were lots of friendly faces and people who I recognized from other clubs who all had the same idea. That being said there was a couple staying in the room next door to me that were definitely not partaking in the race as they had their own marathon that night!

 

The morning of the race was very laid back, possibly due to the small field, with registration a very quick process. To comply with Covid guidelines every runner had to complete an online questionnaire before arriving and then when collecting your number you had your temperature taken and you completed another health questionnaire. As part of my warm up I jogged from the hotel down to the registration, completed the protocols, jogged up to the start line and then did a few strides. It was all very straightforward and after the warm up I felt relatively happy that my knee might hold up.

 

The race numbers were issued on a handicap basis so in other words your number was your predicted finishing position. This also came into play at the start line as they had 100 X’s painted on the road in lines of 5 so numbers 1-5 lined up on the first line, 6-10 on the next line and so forth. My race number was 50 which meant that they thought I was right in the middle of the field. You can imagine my amusement when Barry Minnock, who has a 2.17 marathon, was standing next to me sporting number 51.

 

Considering that I wasn’t fully fit I decided that I wasn’t going to chase a time or a PB and to just run off feel. A half marathon is a good distance for this approach as you can afford to be cagey at the beginning and you can find your way into the race. The opening km is all downhill & with the wind so I had to hold back to not get caught up in the wave of runners who were flying by me. Given the caliber of entry it’s not like other races so I just let myself settle and focused on myself. After about 1500m the road flattens and it remains relatively flat, bar the odd little incline here and there which are mostly man made bridges, until the last 1500m where you go back up the hill you ran down at the beginning. The course itself is a lollipop shape where you run out the long, straight, flat road to the historical walled town of Kilmallock. The town then marks the 10km point and you go under the walled arch and then turn down a country bóirín going in the opposite direction until the 16km mark where you rejoin the main road and return back the way the race started.

 

On its day this course could be wicked fast but Sunday did not lend itself to those conditions. My knee held up reasonably well for the first 15/16km but the last stretch home was a struggle and I was in a lot of discomfort. Another issue was the lack of water stations. This was through no fault of the organisers as they really were restricted with numbers and this impacted the number of volunteers that were allowed on the course. As a compromise there was one water station which you passed twice at 6km & 16km. A lot of people really struggled in the section from Kilmallock back. Another water station in the town could have made a massive difference.

 

After the opening 2km the field had really spread out and due to the small numbers I assumed that the race was now going to be more like a time trial and I wouldn’t see any of the runners in front again. However after Kilmallock, to my surprise, the field started coming back to me quite rapidly and I was overtaking plenty of runners. Very surprisingly there was also a lot of people dropping out. I counted at least 8 (in the end 74 finished out of 93 starters – over 20% drop out rate). As mentioned above by the 16km mark I was struggling and my pace had dropped significantly but my splits were still consistent. In other words I went from averaging say 3.35 p/km to averaging 3.45 p/km. My splits weren’t getting progressively slower as the race went on. This probably explained why the field was coming back to me as it seemed that those in front were having a more gradual slowing in pace.

 

With about 4km to go I could see a group of 5 about 300m in front of me. I was trying to gauge the distance based on time so when they went around a bend I checked my watch and timed how long it took me to reach that bend (about 1 minute 15s). The gap was closing on them the whole time and I knew that I would catch them even despite my own woes. Sure enough with about 1500m to go I was tucked in behind the group and when we passed the 20km mark I was leading the group. The last km here is by far the toughest of the race as you go back up that hill you flew down at the beginning. I finished the race in 77.15 which was well off both my PB and what I would have hoped to run if you had asked me a week ago. My finishing position was 48th so I did beat my handicap by two places!!

 

After the race it seemed that nobody was happy with their performance. Every single person who I spoke with struggled with the conditions and the times were way off what you might expect. For reference the race was won by Mick Clohissy in 65.08 which was a full minute slower than the time he ran last year when finishing 2nd. Hugh Armstrong was 3rd this year after finishing the same position in 2019 but this year he was 2 minutes slower. Sergiu Ciobanu was over 4 minutes off his previous best on this course. There was a lot of confusion after the race amongst the club runners that I know and nobody could explain why everyone underperformed. My own guess is that we were all undercooked due to the lack of races. A half marathon is a tough race to jump into and expect a good time if you haven’t raced in 6 or 7 months. It’s no coincidence that the few runners who did race well had all competed in the Nationals in Santry over the last few weekends.

 

Overall though it was great to be back racing even if the experience was different to what one might be used to and the performance was underwhelming. Huge credit has to be given to Michael Herlihy of North Cork AC who managed to organise a great race with a stellar field whilst also competing himself (take note Michael Cunningham).

 

This is a great course and I would definitely recommend it as a race especially if you were training for one of the flatter marathons such as Berlin or Frankfurt. If you are planning on running the Dublin marathon you are probably better off doing the Dublin half marathon or the Rock N’Roll half as, whilst definitely slower, these two would mimic the Dublin race profile more closely. Overall though I enjoyed my trip to Cork although I probably didn’t enjoy it as much as the couple in room 210 enjoyed theirs!